Hi Justin,
Please see the attached slide deck for our findings:
Slides 2-4 show the background, analysis, observation, and
increment figures for the area near KPWM, which is circled on slide
3. The land/sea mask for this area is included on slide 5 (blue
pixels are land, white are water).
What we suspect is happening is that two of the nearby land-based
observations are being analyzed over water. The positive analysis
increment over water spills over land, degrading the analysis near
KPWM. One of the observations is from CWOP station E2983 (see slide
6); the innovation (ob minus background) at 20240714/18Z was over
10F. The other observation is from a restricted provider, so I will
need to send you a separate message with those details. I can also
share the complete KML file, including restricted obs, with you via
Kiteworks. Our suggestion is to flag these two stations for
temperature on the SDM list to see if it improves URMA temperatures
near KPWM. However, doing this would likely reduce the analyzed air
temperatures over the ocean.
Note: The grid point nearest KPWM, which you show as 93F in RTMA
and URMA, is adjacent to a water grid point, which is much cooler.
The background and analysis values in the KML files are derived
using bilinear interpolation. For this reason, the URMA analysis
value for KPWM is listed as 84.83F in the KML files.
Please let us know if you have any questions and if you'd like to
proceed with flagging these two stations.
Thanks,
Matt
Hi Justin,
Thanks for reaching out. We are taking a look at this and
will follow-up with you once we know more.
Matt
Good Morning,
We're always trying to fine tune temperatures along the
coast of Maine where there is such a land/sea
temperature difference. However, there has been some
interesting behavior lately that I'd like to dig into.
Yesterday was a warm day at the coast, but the RTMA/URMA
was actually significantly warmer at PWM (Portland
Jetport) than observed, which represented the warmest
RTMA/URMA temperature anywhere in our CWA. This has
occurred on multiple occasions.
I have attached one representative hour in plan view (18Z
Sunday), but the table below shows RTMA/URMA/Obs for the
daytime yesterday.
PWM Jetport Temps (7/14/2024) |
| Obs | RTMA | URMA |
8am | 73 | 73 | 74 |
9am | 77 | 78 | 79 |
10am | 81 | 82 | 82 |
11am | 83 | 86 | 86 |
12pm | 86 | 89 | 89 |
1pm | 87 | 91 | 92 |
2pm | 86 | 93 | 93 |
3pm | 87 | 92 | 92 |
4pm | 85 | 90 | 90 |
5pm | 83 | 88 | 88 |
6pm | 80 | 85 | 85 |
7pm | 79 | 83 | 83 |
8pm | 78 | 79 | 79 |
Any insight into what is causing temperatures to be so
high? Clearly the impact on NBM is less than optimal.
Thanks,
Justin
---
Justin Arnott - Science and
Operations Officer
National
Weather Service -
Gray/Portland, ME
--
Justin Arnott RTMA/URMA Discussion Group Virtual
Lab Forum http://vlab.noaa.gov/web/715073/home/-/message_boards/view_message/38657390VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov
--
Matthew Morris
SAIC at NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC
5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2038
College Park, MD 20740
301-683-3758
--
Matthew Morris
SAIC at NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC
5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2038
College Park, MD 20740
301-683-3758