Welcome

Welcome to the RTMA/URMA VLab community!

The purpose of this community is to facilitate feedback and discussion on the RTMA/URMA system. 

Meeting notes are available under the Google Drive Folder linked above.

To learn more about our next upgrade, see the asset publication below.

Use the System Overview to learn more about the system in general.

Use the forum to ask questions about the system and join the discussion with other users and the development team. 

Note that there are two forums: one for precipitation issues and one for all other variables.

You can post to the precip issues forum by sending an email to qpe.rtma.urma.feedback.vlab@noaa.gov.  For all other issues, you can post by sending an email to rtma.feedback.vlab@noaa.gov.  Please note that you must have a user account to post to the forum.  If you do not have an account, please contact matthew.t.morris@noaa.gov.

We recently added the ability for NWS Regional or WFO personnel to request that stations be removed from the analysis.  To access this, click on the "Station Reject Lists and Requests" tab.

There has been recent interest in knowing exact station locations, especially those of METAR sites.  Our METAR information table is under the "METAR Location Info" tab.

Users may also be interested in the National Blend of Models VLab community.

We appreciate any feedback on how this page or community could be improved.  You can submit such feedback via the above email handle or forum.

 

What's New

December 2017 Implementation Summary

Document

Overview of upgrade scheduled for December 2017. Note that this was originally scheduled for October 2017, but has been pushed back due to technical issues.

Forums

Back

Tracking down Obs deviations at PWM - Portland, ME

JA
Justin Arnott, modified 9 Months ago.

Tracking down Obs deviations at PWM - Portland, ME

Youngling Posts: 13 Join Date: 9/11/12 Recent Posts
Good Morning,

We're always trying to fine tune temperatures along the coast of Maine where there is such a land/sea temperature difference.  However, there has been some interesting behavior lately that I'd like to dig into.  Yesterday was a warm day at the coast, but the RTMA/URMA was actually significantly warmer at PWM (Portland Jetport) than observed, which represented the warmest RTMA/URMA temperature anywhere in our CWA. This has occurred on multiple occasions.  

I have attached one representative hour in plan view (18Z Sunday), but the table below shows RTMA/URMA/Obs for the daytime yesterday.

PWM Jetport Temps (7/14/2024)
 ObsRTMAURMA
8am737374
9am777879
10am818282
11am838686
12pm868989
1pm879192
2pm869393
3pm879292
4pm859090
5pm838888
6pm808585
7pm798383
8pm787979


Any insight into what is causing temperatures to be so high?  Clearly the impact on NBM is less than optimal.  

Thanks,
Justin 
---
Justin Arnott - Science and Operations Officer
National Weather Service -  Gray/Portland, ME
207-688-3221 x224   justin.arnott@noaa.gov  
MM
Matthew Morris, modified 9 Months ago.

RE: Tracking down Obs deviations at PWM - Portland, ME

Youngling Posts: 169 Join Date: 12/6/17 Recent Posts
Hi Justin,

Thanks for reaching out.  We are taking a look at this and will follow-up with you once we know more.

Matt

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:36 AM VLab Notifications <VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov> wrote:
Good Morning,

We're always trying to fine tune temperatures along the coast of Maine where there is such a land/sea temperature difference.  However, there has been some interesting behavior lately that I'd like to dig into.  Yesterday was a warm day at the coast, but the RTMA/URMA was actually significantly warmer at PWM (Portland Jetport) than observed, which represented the warmest RTMA/URMA temperature anywhere in our CWA. This has occurred on multiple occasions.  

I have attached one representative hour in plan view (18Z Sunday), but the table below shows RTMA/URMA/Obs for the daytime yesterday.

PWM Jetport Temps (7/14/2024)
 ObsRTMAURMA
8am737374
9am777879
10am818282
11am838686
12pm868989
1pm879192
2pm869393
3pm879292
4pm859090
5pm838888
6pm808585
7pm798383
8pm787979


Any insight into what is causing temperatures to be so high?  Clearly the impact on NBM is less than optimal.  

Thanks,
Justin 
---
Justin Arnott - Science and Operations Officer
National Weather Service -  Gray/Portland, ME
207-688-3221 x224   justin.arnott@noaa.gov  

--
Justin Arnott RTMA/URMA Discussion Group Virtual Lab Forum http://vlab.noaa.gov/web/715073/home/-/message_boards/view_message/38657390VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov


--
Matthew Morris
SAIC at NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC
5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2038
College Park, MD 20740
301-683-3758
MM
Matthew Morris, modified 9 Months ago.

RE: Tracking down Obs deviations at PWM - Portland, ME

Youngling Posts: 169 Join Date: 12/6/17 Recent Posts
Hi Justin,

Please see the attached slide deck for our findings:
Slides 2-4 show the background, analysis, observation, and increment figures for the area near KPWM, which is circled on slide 3.  The land/sea mask for this area is included on slide 5 (blue pixels are land, white are water).

What we suspect is happening is that two of the nearby land-based observations are being analyzed over water.  The positive analysis increment over water spills over land, degrading the analysis near KPWM.  One of the observations is from CWOP station E2983 (see slide 6); the innovation (ob minus background) at 20240714/18Z was over 10F.  The other observation is from a restricted provider, so I will need to send you a separate message with those details.  I can also share the complete KML file, including restricted obs, with you via Kiteworks.  Our suggestion is to flag these two stations for temperature on the SDM list to see if it improves URMA temperatures near KPWM.  However, doing this would likely reduce the analyzed air temperatures over the ocean.

Note: The grid point nearest KPWM, which you show as 93F in RTMA and URMA, is adjacent to a water grid point, which is much cooler.  The background and analysis values in the KML files are derived using bilinear interpolation.  For this reason, the URMA analysis value for KPWM is listed as 84.83F in the KML files.

Please let us know if you have any questions and if you'd like to proceed with flagging these two stations.

Thanks,
Matt

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 4:46 PM Matthew Morris - NOAA Affiliate <matthew.t.morris@noaa.gov> wrote:
Hi Justin,

Thanks for reaching out.  We are taking a look at this and will follow-up with you once we know more.

Matt

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:36 AM VLab Notifications <VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov> wrote:
Good Morning,

We're always trying to fine tune temperatures along the coast of Maine where there is such a land/sea temperature difference.  However, there has been some interesting behavior lately that I'd like to dig into.  Yesterday was a warm day at the coast, but the RTMA/URMA was actually significantly warmer at PWM (Portland Jetport) than observed, which represented the warmest RTMA/URMA temperature anywhere in our CWA. This has occurred on multiple occasions.  

I have attached one representative hour in plan view (18Z Sunday), but the table below shows RTMA/URMA/Obs for the daytime yesterday.

PWM Jetport Temps (7/14/2024)
 ObsRTMAURMA
8am737374
9am777879
10am818282
11am838686
12pm868989
1pm879192
2pm869393
3pm879292
4pm859090
5pm838888
6pm808585
7pm798383
8pm787979


Any insight into what is causing temperatures to be so high?  Clearly the impact on NBM is less than optimal.  

Thanks,
Justin 
---
Justin Arnott - Science and Operations Officer
National Weather Service -  Gray/Portland, ME
207-688-3221 x224   justin.arnott@noaa.gov  

--
Justin Arnott RTMA/URMA Discussion Group Virtual Lab Forum http://vlab.noaa.gov/web/715073/home/-/message_boards/view_message/38657390VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov


--
Matthew Morris
SAIC at NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC
5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2038
College Park, MD 20740
301-683-3758


--
Matthew Morris
SAIC at NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC
5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2038
College Park, MD 20740
301-683-3758

Bookmarks

Bookmarks
  • 2011 RTMA Paper (Weather and Forecasting)

    The most recent peer-reviewed paper on the RTMA. Published in Weather and Forecasting in 2011.
    7 Visits
  • Public RTMA/URMA Viewer

    Another viewer of the current RTMA/URMA, with an archive going back 24 hours. This version is open to the public, but does not contain information about the (many) restricted obs used.
    54 Visits
  • RAP downscaling conference preprint (23rd IIPS)

    This link is to a presentation from the (then) RUC group on how the downscaling process works. Although we now use the RAP, HRRR, and NAM, the logic of the downscaling code is mostly unchanged from this point.
    2 Visits