Forums

Back

RE: Station pie chart clarification/interpretation

ET
Edward Townsend, modified 2 Years ago.

Station pie chart clarification/interpretation

Youngling Posts: 4 Join Date: 8/18/13 Recent Posts

Hello,

 

I had a few Qs on how to interpret the new station pie charts.

1) How do you interpret dataset value?

For example in the image that has a pie chart circled set to dataset value, the pie chart is depicting slightly over half of the NBM components/inputs are below the dataset value of 1 for this 24-hr snow accumulation forecast. How does this pie chart percentage for the dataset value relate to the distribution and the selected dataset value?

2) For image 2 with the pie chart now set to constant value, the pie chart is depicting over three-fourths of the NBM components/inputs are at or above the value of 5", correct?

 

Thanks,

Ed T

DR
David Ruth, modified 2 Years ago.

RE: Station pie chart clarification/interpretation

Youngling Posts: 32 Join Date: 5/12/15 Recent Posts

Ed,

You are currently displaying the NBM v4.1 dataset which has a single value forecast of 5.3" at the point you have circled.

If the dataset value offset were kept at the default of zero, the pie plot would show the number of NBM components that are above or below the 5.3" value.

Because you added an offset of +1 to the dataset value (image 2), WSUP is showing the number of NBM components that are above or below 6.3" (instead of 5.3").

When constant value is selected as the breakpoint (image 1), WSUP is showing the number of NBM components that are above or below that constant value (5.0") at all stations, regardless of what the NBM single-value forecast is.

DR

On 3/9/2023 11:10 AM, Edward Townsend wrote:

Hello,

I had a few Qs on how to interpret the new station pie charts.

1) How do you interpret dataset value?

For example in the image that has a pie chart circled set to dataset value, the pie chart is depicting slightly over half of the NBM components/inputs are below the dataset value of 1 for this 24-hr snow accumulation forecast. How does this pie chart percentage for the dataset value relate to the distribution and the selected dataset value?

2) For image 2 with the pie chart now set to constant value, the pie chart is depicting over three-fourths of the NBM components/inputs are at or above the value of 5", correct?

 

Thanks,

Ed T


--
Edward Townsend Whole Story Uncertainty & Probabilities Viewer Virtual Lab Forum https://vlab.noaa.gov/web/wsup/forums/-/message_boards/view_message/28125387VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov
ET
Edward Townsend, modified 2 Years ago.

RE: Station pie chart clarification/interpretation

Youngling Posts: 4 Join Date: 8/18/13 Recent Posts
Got it, thanks for the quick response. 

--Ed T

On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 9:03 AM David Ruth <VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov> wrote:

Ed,

You are currently displaying the NBM v4.1 dataset which has a single value forecast of 5.3" at the point you have circled.

If the dataset value offset were kept at the default of zero, the pie plot would show the number of NBM components that are above or below the 5.3" value.

Because you added an offset of +1 to the dataset value (image 2), WSUP is showing the number of NBM components that are above or below 6.3" (instead of 5.3").

When constant value is selected as the breakpoint (image 1), WSUP is showing the number of NBM components that are above or below that constant value (5.0") at all stations, regardless of what the NBM single-value forecast is.

DR

On 3/9/2023 11:10 AM, Edward Townsend wrote:

Hello,

I had a few Qs on how to interpret the new station pie charts.

1) How do you interpret dataset value?

For example in the image that has a pie chart circled set to dataset value, the pie chart is depicting slightly over half of the NBM components/inputs are below the dataset value of 1 for this 24-hr snow accumulation forecast. How does this pie chart percentage for the dataset value relate to the distribution and the selected dataset value?

2) For image 2 with the pie chart now set to constant value, the pie chart is depicting over three-fourths of the NBM components/inputs are at or above the value of 5", correct?

 

Thanks,

Ed T


--
Edward Townsend Whole Story Uncertainty & Probabilities Viewer Virtual Lab Forum https://vlab.noaa.gov/web/wsup/forums/-/message_boards/view_message/28125387VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov

--
David Ruth Whole Story Uncertainty & Probabilities Viewer Virtual Lab Forum http://vlab.noaa.gov/web/wsup/forums/-/message_boards/view_message/28125954VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov


--
Ed Townsend
Science and Operations Officer
NOAA/NWS Pendleton, Oregon
541-275-1815 (office) | 386-283-8129 (cell/text)