EMC's Model Evaluation Group

 The Model Evaluation Group (MEG) community is established to interact with the user community on issues related to the forecast systems of NCEP's Environmental Modeling Center (EMC).    It is used to discuss overall model performance and provide feedback on operational and parallel versions of the models which comprise the production suite.

Forums

Back

Re: Good Results on a Frontal Timing

GM
Geoffrey Manikin, modified 6 Years ago.

Re: Good Results on a Frontal Timing

Youngling Posts: 11 Join Date: 8/25/15 Recent Posts

    hi Rob-

           Ok, I had success posting this case.    I'll forward your other email to the list shortly.    I have no idea at all why your posts didn't go through, but I greatly appreciate you taking the time to put this material together.

                           -Geoff

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Geoffrey Manikin - NOAA Federal <geoffrey.manikin@noaa.gov> wrote:


    Posting on behalf of Rob Cox, the SOO at CYS.    His attempt to post didn't work for some reason, but he has an excellent example of FV3GFS improvement with a surge of cold air into southeast WY and is asking if others have seen similar handling of cold surges.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rob Cox - NOAA Federal <rob.cox@noaa.gov>
Date: Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:54 AM
Subject: Good Results on a Frontal Timing
To: FV3GFS-Feedback.VLab@noaa.gov


Hello,

The 09/00Z run of the FV3 did pretty well on the timing of the secondary surge of an Arctic Front. This surge pushed through southeast Wyoming on Friday, February 9, 2018 during the afternoon. The GFS/HRRR/NAM were about 3hrs too slow. We have attached some imagery of the MSLP/Temp from the GFS/FV3 comparisons page. We have also attached imagery from the GFE obs database from Cheyenne. Has anyone else noticed that the FV3 is doing well on the timing of the Arctic Fronts? Please share any feedback.

Thanks,

Rob  


--
Rob Cox
NWS CYS SOO
(307) 772-2468 x766


Navigation Menu

What's New

RE: Appointment Affidavit

Please disregard, VLAB was accidentally included on a private email thread.  V/R, ...

Appointment Affidavit

Attached is your appointment affidavit. Please sign and return to me, then I'll have the CO sign it today. ...

Ice coverage in model guidance

I'm looking for current information on how ice cover is depicted in model guidance (this is specifically in regards to impacts on lake effect convection on the Great Lakes).  I have some...

Michael lead-up

  I wanted to share a video I made comparing GFS and FV3 leading up to Michael. Use  this link  to access the 5min .mp4 file (~15MB) located in the NOAA Google Drive space and...

summaries now available

            The FV3GFS evaluation web page has been updated, with the addition of a summary section.        http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/users/Alicia.Bentley/fv3gfs/            The new...

Evaluation Period Completed

      One final post for the night, I promise......       The official evaluation period for the FV3GFS is now completed.   Centers and NWS Regional SSDs will get information soon, via the...

RE: Re: GFS FV3 #2 in August

    Warren-          Thanks for your post.     I'm attaching an image from the MEG tropical recap presentation given a few weeks ago.    The top panel is track error,...

Fwd: FV3/GFS Comparison: The Good and Bad: Two Case Reviews

      Two more cases from Rob Cox at CYS. Hello, This comparison will be...

Fwd: FV3/GFS Comparison: The Good and Bad: Two Case Reviews

      Two more cases from Rob Cox at CYS. Hello, This comparison will be...

Re: Good Results on a Frontal Timing

    hi Rob-            Ok, I had success posting this case.    I'll forward your other email to the list shortly.    I have no idea at all why your posts didn't go through, but I...

Fwd: Good Results on a Frontal Timing

    Posting on behalf of Rob Cox, the SOO at CYS.    His attempt to post didn't work for some reason, but he has an excellent example of FV3GFS improvement with a surge of...

Re: GFS FV3 #2 in August

Jeff, Great to see!  Interesting to note dramatic difference between GFS and FV3 re both intensity and path of Florence as it approaches the Carolinas (see attached figs). ...

small science change to FV3GFS

    hello-         A modest science change was made to the FV3GFS late last week to address an issue with tropical cyclone intensity being too weak.     This change to an advection scheme...

Intro to MEG Evaluation of FV3GFS Retrospective Cases

Hi all, For those who may have missed yesterday's MEG meeting, we discussed an overview of our plans for evaluating the FV3GFS retrospective cases. The covered information included a...

RE: Better handling of high-level Hurricane moisture outflow?

Hi Tim, Thanks for posting this case!  It's good to see that the FV3 performance was better overall here, and given it was consistently drier than the GFS for several runs, it...

Better handling of high-level Hurricane moisture outflow?

Here is something completely different.  For Fire Weather in the Intermountain West, it is often very subtle model differences that are VERY important.    When Fabio was decaying off the...

fabioclouds.gif

Image

FabioVerifa.png

Image

FabioVerif.png

Image

Fabio10a.png

Image