EMC's Model Evaluation Group

 The Model Evaluation Group (MEG) community is established to interact with the user community on issues related to the forecast systems of NCEP's Environmental Modeling Center (EMC).    It is used to discuss overall model performance and provide feedback on operational and parallel versions of the models which comprise the production suite.

Forums

Back

Fwd: FV3GFS feedback

GP
Gregory Patrick, modified 6 Years ago.

Fwd: FV3GFS feedback

Youngling Posts: 1 Join Date: 9/24/12 Recent Posts
SR SOOs and DOHs,

In an effort to get as much feedback as possible on the new FV3-GFS system (now running in parallel), EMC has set up a special email address as a simple way to provide feedback.  The attachment (single slide) has more details. You can basically send an email to fv3gfs-feedback.vlab@noaa.gov , and the content of your email will automagically appear as a post in the VLab FV3GFS Evaluation Forum.  EMC also recommends that users either subscribe to the forum OR identify themselves in the text of the email message. 

Here is a link to the web page, with plenty of links to FV3-GFS data, GFS and FV3-GFS comparison sites, and general FV3 information:

Greg 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Geoffrey Manikin - NOAA Federal <geoffrey.manikin@noaa.gov>
Date: Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:31 PM
Subject: FV3GFS feedback


   hello SSD chiefs-

            I've attached a slide from a MEG presentation last week in which we announced the creation of a mailing list to post FV3GFS feedback directly into the VLab forum.   Can you please share this slide with your SOOs or whomever you think would want this information?     We want to hear feedback from the field, especially if any oddities in the FV3 output are observed, and this mailing list makes it easy to do so.     It also serves as a way for us to send relevant FV3GFS announcements, so we encourage users to subscribe to the forum:   https://vlab.noaa.gov/web/emc-model-evaluation-group/discussions-forums-/-/message_boards/category/3251785

          Thank you, and let me know if you have any questions.

                              -Geoff

SS
Stephan Smith, modified 6 Years ago.

Fwd: [EMC Model Evaluation Group - FV3 evaluation] Fwd: FV3GFS feedback

Youngling Posts: 1 Join Date: 5/15/12 Recent Posts
"automagically"  🔮
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gregory Patrick <VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov>
Date: Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM
Subject: [EMC Model Evaluation Group - FV3 evaluation] Fwd: FV3GFS feedback
To: "VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov" <VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov>


SR SOOs and DOHs,

In an effort to get as much feedback as possible on the new FV3-GFS system (now running in parallel), EMC has set up a special email address as a simple way to provide feedback.  The attachment (single slide) has more details. You can basically send an email to fv3gfs-feedback.vlab@noaa.gov , and the content of your email will automagically appear as a post in the VLab FV3GFS Evaluation Forum.  EMC also recommends that users either subscribe to the forum OR identify themselves in the text of the email message. 

Here is a link to the web page, with plenty of links to FV3-GFS data, GFS and FV3-GFS comparison sites, and general FV3 information:

Greg 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Geoffrey Manikin - NOAA Federal <geoffrey.manikin@noaa.gov>
Date: Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:31 PM
Subject: FV3GFS feedback


   hello SSD chiefs-

            I've attached a slide from a MEG presentation last week in which we announced the creation of a mailing list to post FV3GFS feedback directly into the VLab forum.   Can you please share this slide with your SOOs or whomever you think would want this information?     We want to hear feedback from the field, especially if any oddities in the FV3 output are observed, and this mailing list makes it easy to do so.     It also serves as a way for us to send relevant FV3GFS announcements, so we encourage users to subscribe to the forum:   https://vlab.noaa.gov/web/emc-model-evaluation-group/discussions-forums-/-/message_boards/category/3251785

          Thank you, and let me know if you have any questions.

                              -Geoff


--
Gregory Patrick EMC Model Evaluation Group Virtual Lab Forum http://vlab.noaa.gov/web/emc-model-evaluation-group/home/-/message_boards/view_message/4365335VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov



--
Dr. Stephan (Steve) Smith 

Director - NOAA VLab

Chief - Decision Support Branch
Meteorological Development Laboratory
Office of Science and Technology Integration
National Weather Service
O: 301-427-9495, C/M: 301-928-8431
LDS-424, Pack 4

Navigation Menu

What's New

RE: Appointment Affidavit

Please disregard, VLAB was accidentally included on a private email thread.  V/R, ...

Appointment Affidavit

Attached is your appointment affidavit. Please sign and return to me, then I'll have the CO sign it today. ...

Ice coverage in model guidance

I'm looking for current information on how ice cover is depicted in model guidance (this is specifically in regards to impacts on lake effect convection on the Great Lakes).  I have some...

Michael lead-up

  I wanted to share a video I made comparing GFS and FV3 leading up to Michael. Use  this link  to access the 5min .mp4 file (~15MB) located in the NOAA Google Drive space and...

summaries now available

            The FV3GFS evaluation web page has been updated, with the addition of a summary section.        http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/users/Alicia.Bentley/fv3gfs/            The new...

Evaluation Period Completed

      One final post for the night, I promise......       The official evaluation period for the FV3GFS is now completed.   Centers and NWS Regional SSDs will get information soon, via the...

RE: Re: GFS FV3 #2 in August

    Warren-          Thanks for your post.     I'm attaching an image from the MEG tropical recap presentation given a few weeks ago.    The top panel is track error,...

Fwd: FV3/GFS Comparison: The Good and Bad: Two Case Reviews

      Two more cases from Rob Cox at CYS. Hello, This comparison will be...

Fwd: FV3/GFS Comparison: The Good and Bad: Two Case Reviews

      Two more cases from Rob Cox at CYS. Hello, This comparison will be...

Re: Good Results on a Frontal Timing

    hi Rob-            Ok, I had success posting this case.    I'll forward your other email to the list shortly.    I have no idea at all why your posts didn't go through, but I...

Fwd: Good Results on a Frontal Timing

    Posting on behalf of Rob Cox, the SOO at CYS.    His attempt to post didn't work for some reason, but he has an excellent example of FV3GFS improvement with a surge of...

Re: GFS FV3 #2 in August

Jeff, Great to see!  Interesting to note dramatic difference between GFS and FV3 re both intensity and path of Florence as it approaches the Carolinas (see attached figs). ...

small science change to FV3GFS

    hello-         A modest science change was made to the FV3GFS late last week to address an issue with tropical cyclone intensity being too weak.     This change to an advection scheme...

Intro to MEG Evaluation of FV3GFS Retrospective Cases

Hi all, For those who may have missed yesterday's MEG meeting, we discussed an overview of our plans for evaluating the FV3GFS retrospective cases. The covered information included a...

RE: Better handling of high-level Hurricane moisture outflow?

Hi Tim, Thanks for posting this case!  It's good to see that the FV3 performance was better overall here, and given it was consistently drier than the GFS for several runs, it...

Better handling of high-level Hurricane moisture outflow?

Here is something completely different.  For Fire Weather in the Intermountain West, it is often very subtle model differences that are VERY important.    When Fabio was decaying off the...

fabioclouds.gif

Image

FabioVerifa.png

Image

FabioVerif.png

Image

Fabio10a.png

Image