Welcome

Welcome to the RTMA/URMA VLab community!

The purpose of this community is to facilitate feedback and discussion on the RTMA/URMA system. 

Meeting notes are available under the Google Drive Folder linked above.

To learn more about our next upgrade, see the asset publication below.

Use the System Overview to learn more about the system in general.

Use the forum to ask questions about the system and join the discussion with other users and the development team. 

Note that there are two forums: one for precipitation issues and one for all other variables.

You can post to the precip issues forum by sending an email to qpe.rtma.urma.feedback.vlab@noaa.gov.  For all other issues, you can post by sending an email to rtma.feedback.vlab@noaa.gov.  Please note that you must have a user account to post to the forum.  If you do not have an account, please contact matthew.t.morris@noaa.gov.

We recently added the ability for NWS Regional or WFO personnel to request that stations be removed from the analysis.  To access this, click on the "Station Reject Lists and Requests" tab.

There has been recent interest in knowing exact station locations, especially those of METAR sites.  Our METAR information table is under the "METAR Location Info" tab.

Users may also be interested in the National Blend of Models VLab community.

We appreciate any feedback on how this page or community could be improved.  You can submit such feedback via the above email handle or forum.

 

What's New

December 2017 Implementation Summary

Document

Overview of upgrade scheduled for December 2017. Note that this was originally scheduled for October 2017, but has been pushed back due to technical issues.

Forums

Back

URMA Monthly MinT Errors at KTLH and KCTY

DV
Don Van Dyke, modified 1 Year ago.

URMA Monthly MinT Errors at KTLH and KCTY

Youngling Posts: 6 Join Date: 4/12/16 Recent Posts

Greetings,

My latest local feedback involves examining some MinT errors during October across the Florida Big Bend, specifically at KTLH and KCTY.  The slides can be found here.  In the case of KCTY, URMA had a larger bias when verified against the METAR than NDFD, GMOS, or NBM through the first couple of days of the forecast.  In addition, both locations are frequently dipping below the NBM 5th percentile MinT on strong radiational cooling nights.  I show a one week period in October as an example in the slides.  GMOS seems to understand this behavior the best.

--
Don Van Dyke
Lead Forecaster
WSR-88D, Storm Data, and Verification Focal Points
NWS Tallahassee, FL
(850) 942-8833
"It's all connected!" --Manifest
Young-Joon Kim, modified 1 Year ago.

RE: URMA Monthly MinT Errors at KTLH and KCTY

Youngling Posts: 12 Join Date: 11/15/16 Recent Posts

Bias due to radiational cooling (resulting in cold pools) is a popular source of error. A serious, recurring example is found in Canaan Valley, WV. We have analyzed a couple of cases (10 & 11) in our NBM case evaluation report.  

-yj (AFS11)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks
  • 2011 RTMA Paper (Weather and Forecasting)

    The most recent peer-reviewed paper on the RTMA. Published in Weather and Forecasting in 2011.
    7 Visits
  • Public RTMA/URMA Viewer

    Another viewer of the current RTMA/URMA, with an archive going back 24 hours. This version is open to the public, but does not contain information about the (many) restricted obs used.
    52 Visits
  • RAP downscaling conference preprint (23rd IIPS)

    This link is to a presentation from the (then) RUC group on how the downscaling process works. Although we now use the RAP, HRRR, and NAM, the logic of the downscaling code is mostly unchanged from this point.
    2 Visits