Hi Jeffrey,
We've dealt with this issue of models
displacing QPF for a long time in the complex terrain of Colorado.
To start with a better initialization, the smart inits are
adjusting QPF up over the terrain, and down in the valleys. This
helps to get at least get the right picture in place before further
refinements are made. In addition to the simple up/down terrain, we
can also take advantage of a locally run orographic precipitation
model, which accounts for many parameters such as wind direction,
speed, moisture depth (mixing ratio, cloud water), lapse rate, etc.
While there is no hydrometeor drift in this simple 2 dimensional
model, it can help with diagnosing orographically produced
precipitation and snowfall.
I've attached a couple examples of
the QPF smart inits, and you'll note the adjustments made (0.03
additional per 1000 feet over the model terrain, and 0.02 reduction
per 1000 feet below model terrain). You can note big differences,
roughly doubling the mountain top QPF versus valley QPF in our
upcoming precipitation event. Obviously, those can be adjusted, but
we've found those to work pretty well here in our normally drier
climate. A lot of Western Region sites also make use of PRISM
data and that has also shown to be extremely beneficial. We hope
some of this can get adapted in the NBM.