EMC's Model Evaluation Group

 The Model Evaluation Group (MEG) community is established to interact with the user community on issues related to the forecast systems of NCEP's Environmental Modeling Center (EMC).    It is used to discuss overall model performance and provide feedback on operational and parallel versions of the models which comprise the production suite.

Forums

Back

More evidence of FV3 being a bit wetter...

JS
Jack Settelmaier, modified 6 Years ago.

More evidence of FV3 being a bit wetter...

Youngling Posts: 18 Join Date: 11/2/12 Recent Posts

...as we compare two dModel/dt trend loops for the GFS:

 

 

and the FV3:

 

 

Both are showing the trends in the Total Precip ending at 12Z, Fri Jul 8th. The FV3 is a bit wetter in many of its forecasts, especially for the more interior portions of Texas, where drought is a bit more intense.

 

Jack Settelmaier

JS
Jack Settelmaier, modified 6 Years ago.

RE: More evidence of FV3 being a bit wetter...

Youngling Posts: 18 Join Date: 11/2/12 Recent Posts

I believe I spoke too soon, and too inconclusively, in stating that this Southeast TX event was a clear indication that the FV3 was wetter in its lead-up forecasts than the GFS.  There is obviously A LOT of data to visualize and sift through to make such a comment, and I should be more careful and thorough.  However, I'm also trying to find the right balance in creating content for these model evaluation forums, versus the amount of available time.

Granted the prior (original) post was showing Total Precip (Rainfall) forecasts through 12Z, Sun Jul 8th, around the Houston area, but we've already had an impacting amount of rainfall, as can be seen in the below two graphics.

This first image is showing 72-hr MRMS Q3 rainfall totals (not QCed) with a valid ending time ~17Z, Thu Jul 5th.  On the color scale of this image, the reds begin the amounts equal or greater than 2 inches. The deeper blues and cyan are showing amounts in excess of 6 inches. , A Harris County Flood Control District gauge located at I-10 West and West Loop 610 in Houston reported in excess of 8 inches, all which fell within a mere ~8 hours the morning of the July 4th holiday!!  [Data link and image provided by Victor Murphy.] 

So, suffice it to say, this already has been a significant event, but hopefully one that is mostly over.

 

In this below 2-panel image, is the same 72-hr MRMS data, as pulled from a UCAR THREDDS data server, and near the same ending time, ~20Z, Thu Jul 6. These images are designed to only BEGIN their color curves at user-selected 72-hr rainfall amount totals.  On the left, the colored areas show where at least 2 inches (50.8mm) of rainfall fell.  So, the areas should roughly match the reds and amounts above from the image above.  Areas in black on the left, are off the high end of the left image's color scale, and are in excess of 6 inches, which is the same amount (6") where the image on the right BEGINS its coloration.  This may seem confusing, but displaying it in this way, using filtered WMS pulls from a THREDDS server allows a user to convey more precisely details about an event (future, present, or past).

So, suffice it to say, some rather HEAVY amounts (amounts exceeding monthly average totals) fell, though these amounts should not have been TOO surprising, given the tropical underpinnings of the low pressure system that produced the rainfall. 

 

Below, is a cherry-picked image (in contrast to the trend loops posted earlier) from EMC's Geoff Manikin's FV3/GFS compare site that shows the 60-hr forecasts of the 24-hour forecast rainfall amounts from the GFS on the left, and FV3 on the right, ending at 00Z, Jul 5.  This image not only shows this particular GFS forecast indicating higher 24-hr rainfall totals (5-6 inches if I'm seeing the colors right) right over Houston, but also amounts, for this one snapshot, that are in excess of the FV3.   A pretty good forecast.

 

 

I will close this updated post out with sharing a GEFS QPF plume for KIAH (available from Tracy's site here) from the 00Z, Jul 2nd run, which shows a >3 inch forecast to fall on July 4th.

 

 

Navigation Menu

What's New

RE: Appointment Affidavit

Please disregard, VLAB was accidentally included on a private email thread.  V/R, ...

Appointment Affidavit

Attached is your appointment affidavit. Please sign and return to me, then I'll have the CO sign it today. ...

Ice coverage in model guidance

I'm looking for current information on how ice cover is depicted in model guidance (this is specifically in regards to impacts on lake effect convection on the Great Lakes).  I have some...

Michael lead-up

  I wanted to share a video I made comparing GFS and FV3 leading up to Michael. Use  this link  to access the 5min .mp4 file (~15MB) located in the NOAA Google Drive space and...

summaries now available

            The FV3GFS evaluation web page has been updated, with the addition of a summary section.        http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/users/Alicia.Bentley/fv3gfs/            The new...

Evaluation Period Completed

      One final post for the night, I promise......       The official evaluation period for the FV3GFS is now completed.   Centers and NWS Regional SSDs will get information soon, via the...

RE: Re: GFS FV3 #2 in August

    Warren-          Thanks for your post.     I'm attaching an image from the MEG tropical recap presentation given a few weeks ago.    The top panel is track error,...

Fwd: FV3/GFS Comparison: The Good and Bad: Two Case Reviews

      Two more cases from Rob Cox at CYS. Hello, This comparison will be...

Fwd: FV3/GFS Comparison: The Good and Bad: Two Case Reviews

      Two more cases from Rob Cox at CYS. Hello, This comparison will be...

Re: Good Results on a Frontal Timing

    hi Rob-            Ok, I had success posting this case.    I'll forward your other email to the list shortly.    I have no idea at all why your posts didn't go through, but I...

Fwd: Good Results on a Frontal Timing

    Posting on behalf of Rob Cox, the SOO at CYS.    His attempt to post didn't work for some reason, but he has an excellent example of FV3GFS improvement with a surge of...

Re: GFS FV3 #2 in August

Jeff, Great to see!  Interesting to note dramatic difference between GFS and FV3 re both intensity and path of Florence as it approaches the Carolinas (see attached figs). ...

small science change to FV3GFS

    hello-         A modest science change was made to the FV3GFS late last week to address an issue with tropical cyclone intensity being too weak.     This change to an advection scheme...

Intro to MEG Evaluation of FV3GFS Retrospective Cases

Hi all, For those who may have missed yesterday's MEG meeting, we discussed an overview of our plans for evaluating the FV3GFS retrospective cases. The covered information included a...

RE: Better handling of high-level Hurricane moisture outflow?

Hi Tim, Thanks for posting this case!  It's good to see that the FV3 performance was better overall here, and given it was consistently drier than the GFS for several runs, it...

Better handling of high-level Hurricane moisture outflow?

Here is something completely different.  For Fire Weather in the Intermountain West, it is often very subtle model differences that are VERY important.    When Fabio was decaying off the...

fabioclouds.gif

Image

FabioVerifa.png

Image

FabioVerif.png

Image

Fabio10a.png

Image