Darren,
It looks like there area couple mesonet obs on islands in the lake (Gunnison Island and Hat Island) that are reporting moisture levels much lower than the background. It also appears that, due to the escarpment relaxation we put in at your request, some of their influence is seeping onto the land, further drying out air that is already quite dry according to the background field.
The plots are of specific humidity, which is what URMA actually analyzes. These two obs have innovations of -3 g/kg. When nearby areas have a background values of less than 3 g/kg, obviously you can't have negative moisture but that can make for some very dry analysis values. At these levels, even small absolute amounts of moisture can change the dew point significantly.
If you click on the links above, you can see the the dew points at these obs varied wildly at 00-02Z on the 8th (the links are set to that time already). In each station, I can see a 9-10 F change in dew point in 5 minutes. I don't know how realistic those values are. If they are not, we can flag those two stations for moisture and see if that has an impact.
In the current URMA, all those obs will sort of be mushed together. In the parallel URMA/URMAX we only use the ob closest to analysis time, right on the hour in this case. I think that may have something to do with the dulling that takes place in the URMAX.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-Pf1CYSe258nRpjio-pLdX8MaSv3DZ37KjppdDswpv4/edit?usp=sharing
Steve