Hi Brett,
Please see the following slide deck:
As a general reminder, the minT analysis is derived for the
period of 7P-8A LST, which corresponds to 02Z-15Z for this
particular case. The background for the minT analysis is derived by
taking the min of the hourly background/analysis fields over the
aforementioned time period. This background is then used in
conjunction with the observations to derive the minT analysis, which
is run as part of the 20Z URMA cycle.
In this particular case, the GBFW4, WACFA, WY42, and BSRW4
minT observations were rejected due to failing the gross error
check. In addition, when considering the hourly analyses, the WACFA
observation was rejected at 15Z, the GBFW4 observations were
rejected from 09Z-15Z, and the BSRW4 observations were rejected from
11Z-15Z, all for failing the gross error check. The hourly
temperature observations were rejected despite the gross error check
being relaxed due to complex terrain. In general, RTMA/URMA will
struggle to capture cold pools that are not present in the
background fields, particularly when the innovations are as large as
this particular case. While some of the hourly temperature
observations that captured this cold pool were rejected, the
assimilated observations acted to cool the analysis fields and, by
extension, the minT background; please see slides 6-19.
We expect to see improvements in such cases in the upcoming
3D-RTMA/URMA suite, which is expected to be implemented in FY2024.
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Matt