Forums

Back

RE: RTMA/URMA Terrain Gradient Issue in Temperature Analysis along Wasatch Front / Great Salt Lake

DC
David Church, modified 2 Days ago.

RTMA/URMA Terrain Gradient Issue in Temperature Analysis along Wasatch Front / Great Salt Lake

Youngling Posts: 10 Join Date: 1/8/14 Recent Posts

Lately we've noticed some higher temperature forecasts from the NBM along the benches (transitions between the mountains and valleys), than in the valley floors. I was able to trace this back to the RTMA and URMA analysis which is impacting the bias correction in the NBM. This also seems to happen at some pixels along the boundary of the Great Salt Lake lake shore as well. The issue is fairly ubiquitous at these transition zones in elevation, and does not appear to be limited to any specific observation site issues. The other odd thing is that I actually can't explain how the RMTA and URMA are arriving at the final analysis values. Using the KML files available to see how the obs are impacting the RTMA analysis, the final analysis values for the offending pixels in the KML file are actually reasonable values, but they don't actually match what I'm seeing the gridded RTMA and URMA. Furthermore, it appears the RTMA is too warm at these locations, but the URMA is even warmer at these locations, like the error magnifies between the RTMA and URMA. I've attached some examples are specific points, but the issue is far more widespread than just these pixels. The issue also shows up any day, and seem independent of how warm/cool the day is, we just happened to notice this on the warmer days as this has downstream impacts to the NBM and thus HeatRisk forecasts as well.

MM
Matthew Morris, modified 1 Day ago.

RE: RTMA/URMA Terrain Gradient Issue in Temperature Analysis along Wasatch Front / Great Salt Lake

Youngling Posts: 170 Join Date: 12/6/17 Recent Posts
Hi David,

Thanks for sharing this case with us.  We are looking into it and will follow-up once we know more, likely early next week.

Matt

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:21 PM VLab Notifications <VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov> wrote:

Lately we've noticed some higher temperature forecasts from the NBM along the benches (transitions between the mountains and valleys), than in the valley floors. I was able to trace this back to the RTMA and URMA analysis which is impacting the bias correction in the NBM. This also seems to happen at some pixels along the boundary of the Great Salt Lake lake shore as well. The issue is fairly ubiquitous at these transition zones in elevation, and does not appear to be limited to any specific observation site issues. The other odd thing is that I actually can't explain how the RMTA and URMA are arriving at the final analysis values. Using the KML files available to see how the obs are impacting the RTMA analysis, the final analysis values for the offending pixels in the KML file are actually reasonable values, but they don't actually match what I'm seeing the gridded RTMA and URMA. Furthermore, it appears the RTMA is too warm at these locations, but the URMA is even warmer at these locations, like the error magnifies between the RTMA and URMA. I've attached some examples are specific points, but the issue is far more widespread than just these pixels. The issue also shows up any day, and seem independent of how warm/cool the day is, we just happened to notice this on the warmer days as this has downstream impacts to the NBM and thus HeatRisk forecasts as well.


--
David Church RTMA/URMA Discussion Group Virtual Lab Forum https://vlab.noaa.gov/web/715073/discussions-forums-/-/message_boards/view_message/45549960VLab.Notifications@noaa.gov


--
Matthew Morris
SAIC at NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC
5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2038
College Park, MD 20740
301-683-3758